Infor to NetSuite Data Migration
Migrating from Infor to NetSuite? Mine automates the mapping between Infor's industry-specific data model and NetSuite's cloud ERP — preserving item masters, customer records, manufacturing data, and financial history across Infor LN, M3, or CloudSuite.
Working with enterprise teams on active migration programs
5–10 weeks
to production-ready mappings
40–50%
cost reduction vs. manual migration
90%+
average mapping confidence
Most enterprise migrations start 6+ months behind schedule. Yours doesn't have to.
This guide is for VPs of IT, data architects, and migration leads at companies moving data from Infor to Oracle NetSuite — whether you're scoping, planning, or mid-program.
Infor LN stores data in session-based tables — tcibd001 (Items), tccom100 (Business Partners), tipcf001 (BOM Lines), tisfc001 (Production Orders) — using a multi-company, multi-site architecture. Infor M3 uses a different schema with tables like MITMAS (Item Master), OCUSMA (Customer), and MPDMAT (BOM). NetSuite uses a unified cloud object model. Mine identifies which Infor product line you're migrating from and maps the correct source schema to NetSuite automatically.
Based on enterprise migration programs led by Mine's founding team
Last updated March 2026
How Mine automates your Infor to Oracle NetSuite migration
Mine detects which Infor product line your database runs — LN, M3, CloudSuite Industrial, or CloudSuite Distribution — and applies the correct source schema mapping. No manual table-by-table identification needed.
Infor's Business Partner model (where one entity can be customer, vendor, or both) is automatically split into NetSuite's separate Customer and Vendor record types with cross-references preserved.
Manufacturing data — BOMs, routings, and production orders — is restructured from Infor's production planning model to NetSuite's manufacturing module format with proper component quantities and operation sequences.
Multi-company configurations are mapped to NetSuite OneWorld subsidiaries with intercompany relationships, transfer pricing rules, and elimination entries documented for the finance team.

Get your Infor to Oracle NetSuite mapping analysis — see results in under an hour
Migration timeline: manual vs. Mine
Traditional approach
Timeline
8–18 months
Estimated cost
$400K–2M
Team size
5–12 consultants
Typically requires
×Manual field mapping in spreadsheets
×Custom ABAP/SQL extraction scripts
×3–5 mock migration cycles
×Dedicated source system consultants
×Manual reconciliation testing
With Mine
Enterprise benchmarksTimeline
5–10 weeks
Team size
2–4 internal resources
Estimated cost
40–50% less
Included
✓Schema profiling & analysis
✓AI-generated field mappings
✓Transformation SQL
✓Validation & readiness reports
✓Production-ready load files
Common challenges migrating from Infor to Oracle NetSuite
Infor product line identification and schema mapping
Infor's portfolio includes LN, M3, CloudSuite Industrial (SyteLine), CloudSuite Distribution (formerly Distribution SX.e), VISUAL, and others — each with a completely different database schema. The item master is tcibd001 in LN, MITMAS in M3, and item in SyteLine. Mine identifies which Infor product your database runs and applies the correct schema mapping to NetSuite.
Explore related migrations →Multi-company and multi-site financial consolidation
Infor LN and M3 support complex multi-company and multi-site configurations with intercompany trading, transfer pricing, and consolidated financial reporting. NetSuite handles this through OneWorld subsidiaries and intercompany automation. The entity structure mapping — Infor companies to NetSuite subsidiaries, Infor sites to NetSuite locations — affects every transactional record in the migration.
Explore related migrations →Manufacturing data restructuring
Infor LN stores BOMs in tipcf001 (BOM lines) with routing operations in tirou001. Infor M3 uses MPDMAT (BOM material) and MPDOPE (BOM operation). Both have multi-level BOM structures with revision tracking. NetSuite uses BOM records with component lines and routing steps. The restructuring from Infor's production planning model to NetSuite's manufacturing module requires careful component-level mapping.
Explore related migrations →Business partner model to NetSuite customer/vendor split
Infor LN uses a unified Business Partner model (tccom100) where a single entity can be a customer, vendor, or both — with roles assigned to the same business partner record. NetSuite separates customers and vendors into distinct record types. Mine splits Infor business partners into the correct NetSuite record types while preserving cross-references for entities that are both customer and vendor.
Explore related migrations →Chart of accounts and dimension translation
Infor LN uses ledger accounts with dimensions. Infor M3 uses accounting strings with division, accounting identity, and cost center. NetSuite uses accounts with classes, departments, and locations as segments. The dimensional model translation affects all financial data and must be validated before any journal entries migrate.
Explore related migrations →Infor to Oracle NetSuite field mapping — what data moves
12 data objects typically migrated
| Source Object | → | Target Object |
|---|---|---|
| tcibd001 / MITMAS (Item Master) | → | Item |
| tccom100 / OCUSMA (Business Partner / Customer) | → | Customer |
| tccom100 / CIDVEN (Business Partner / Vendor) | → | Vendor |
| tipcf001 / MPDMAT (BOM) | → | BOM / BOM Revision |
| tirou001 / MPDOPE (Routing) | → | Routing |
| tisfc001 / MWOHED (Production Order) | → | Work Order |
| tdsls400 / OOLINE (Sales Order) | → | Sales Order |
| tdpur400 / MPLINE (Purchase Order) | → | Purchase Order |
| Inventory (whwmd210 / MITBAL) | → | Inventory Adjustment |
| G/L Entries (tfgld100 / FSLEDG) | → | Journal Entry |
| AR (tdsls410 / ARS100) | → | Invoice / Customer Payment |
| AP (tdpur410 / APS100) | → | Vendor Bill / Vendor Payment |
Typical enterprise migrations include 500K–10M+ records across these objects. Mine handles profiling and mapping at any scale.
The cost of manual Infor to Oracle NetSuite migration
Companies typically engage Infor-specialist consulting firms for 8–18 months. The data conversion effort — identifying which Infor product line is in use, mapping its specific schema to NetSuite, handling multi-company/multi-site data, and migrating financial history — is one of the most difficult workstreams because of Infor's schema fragmentation.
Frequently asked questions
Related migration paths
In one enterprise migration, a single field mapping error in customer master data caused $100K in billing discrepancies that went undetected for 6 months.
Mine catches these issues before they reach production.
Built by a team that led SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce data migration programs for Fortune 500 companies at a Big 4 consulting firm. Currently in design partnership with enterprise clients running active migration programs.
Ready to migrate from Infor to Oracle NetSuite?
Tell us about your migration and we'll show you how Mine can help.
No commitment required. We'll review your migration scope and share a preliminary assessment within 48 hours.
You'll receive a preliminary mapping analysis showing how your source objects map to your target schema, with confidence scores and flagged risk areas.
